run4life
Indiana
Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 9
|
|
What... Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 11:59 am |
|
|
What would be a good time for a 1600 and an 800 if you are 13 year old girl?
|
|
|
XC-PA
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 11
|
|
Re: What... Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:12 pm |
|
|
Well for the 1600 (6.20ish) and the 800 (2.45ish). You mighte be faster but thats what i think.
|
|
|
OldManRunner
Runworks 2005 5M Racer
Rochester, NY
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 262
|
|
Re: What... Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:36 pm |
|
|
Yeah, that sounds about right to me too...although I might categorize those times as "really good" and not just "good". We actually discussed this a while back, and you might be able to get to the thread via http://www.runworks.com/viewtopic.php?t=43. If that doesn't work, check under the "General Discussion" category for the topic "Average Time for a Kid's Mile".
|
|
|
Rickshaw
Runworks 2005 5M Racer
San Francisco, CA
Joined: 26 Nov 2004
Posts: 1156
|
|
Re: What... Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:29 pm |
|
|
I found some numbers online-- 6:10 for 1600 meters was enough to win the New Hampshire state title for the girls 13-14 age group in 2000. So I'd say if you're running somewhere around 6:30 +/- then you're doing quite well. But I guess all that really matters is where you place in your races!
|
|
|
run4life
Indiana
Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 9
|
|
Re: What... Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 6:34 pm |
|
|
Thanx for the times. That makes me feel a lot better about my PRs. Its hard to tell when there are so many good runners to race against.
|
|
|
|
View posts: |
